Dinosaur fossils carbon dating, related articles
The research by Miller et al.
Thank you for the explanation. Creationist Christianity doesn't happen in a vacuum, people. This is what happens when you try to get members of the academic community involved: Radiocarbon dating just helps us zero in on a more precise estimate.
Certain parts of bone look like a sponge under the microscope. Dinosaurs supposedly died out 65 million years ago.
The fluctuation of the amount of C in the atmosphere over time adds a small uncertainty, but contamination by "modern carbon" such as decayed organic matter from soils poses a greater possibility for error. The NCSE is appealing to an absurd scenario. You may be content to derail it, but I'm not going to participate. He is basically accusing you of committing the fallacy of appealing to a false authority, in this dinosaur fossils carbon dating, yourself.
You must create an account or log in to vote on posts on Reddit.
Please, by all means, validate these test if you can. In a similar manner, the more evidence of young ages for dinosaur fossils, the more compelling the evidence in total becomes.
Radiometric C14 dating isn't the same as counting radioactive decays in real time. Because science isn't about finding evidence to prove something you think is the case -- it's about making a theory based on observations and attempting to disprove that theory.
Finding measurable C14 in the bones would therefore invalidate the consensus belief that dinosaurs lived and died over 65 million years ago. However, the abstract of the Miller presentation was removed from the website for the conference.
I have renounced my belief in science. In fact, the article by Leppert raises a number of additional issues e.
This has been argued before, but the testing process itself is loaded with procedures that rigorously remove contaminants. No, of course not, because it's typical to find water is wet. I didn't know this claim was still out there.